Home > Papers

 
 
Distinct features of auditory steady-state responses as compared to transient event-related potentials
ZHANG Li 1,PENG Weiwei 2,ZHANG Zhiguo 3,HU Li 4 * #
1.School of Psychology, Southwest University, ChongQing 400715
2.Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
3.Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
4.School of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715
*Correspondence author
#Submitted by
Subject:
Funding: 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(No.20120182120002)
Opened online:27 May 2013
Accepted by: none
Citation: ZHANG Li,PENG Weiwei,ZHANG Zhiguo.Distinct features of auditory steady-state responses as compared to transient event-related potentials[OL]. [27 May 2013] http://en.paper.edu.cn/en_releasepaper/content/4543853
 
 
Transient event-related potentials (ERPs) and steady-state responses (SSRs) have been popularly employed to investigate the function of the human brain, but their relationship still remains a matter of debate. Some researchers believed that SSRs could be explained by the linear summation of successive transient ERPs (superposition hypothesis), while others believed that SSRs were result of the entrainment of a neural rhythm driven by the periodic repetition of a sensory stimulus (oscillatory entrainment hypothesis). In the present study, taking auditory modality as an example, we aimed to clarify the distinct features of SSRs, evoked by the 40-Hz and 60-Hz periodic auditory stimulation, as compared to transient ERPs, evoked by a single click. We observed that (1) SSRs were mainly generated by phase synchronization, while late latency responses (LLRs) in transient ERPs were mainly generated by power enhancement; (2) scalp topographies of LLRs in transient ERPs were markedly different from those of SSRs; (3) the powers of both 40-Hz and 60-Hz SSRs were significantly correlated, while they were not significantly correlated with the N1 power in transient ERPs; (4) whereas SSRs were dominantly modulated by stimulus intensity, middle latency responses (MLRs) were not significantly modulated by both stimulus intensity and subjective loudness judgment, and LLRs were significantly modulated by subjective loudness judgment even within the same stimulus intensity. All these findings indicated that high-frequency SSRs were different from both MLRs and LLRs in transient ERPs, thus supporting the possibility of oscillatory entrainment hypothesis to the generation of SSRs. Therefore, SSRs could be used to explore distinct neural responses as compared to transient ERPs, and help us reveal novel and reliable neural mechanisms of the human brain.
Keywords:Physiology; Transient event-related potentials (Transient ERPs); Steady-state responses (SSRs); Superposition hypothesis; Oscillatory entrainment hypothesis; Auditory system
 
 
 

For this paper

  • PDF (0B)
  • ● Revision 0   
  • ● Print this paper
  • ● Recommend this paper to a friend
  • ● Add to my favorite list

    Saved Papers

    Please enter a name for this paper to be shown in your personalized Saved Papers list

Tags

Add yours

Related Papers

Statistics

PDF Downloaded 329
Bookmarked 0
Recommend 5
Comments Array
Submit your papers