Home > Papers

 
 
One-Shock Versus Continuous Defibrillation in an 8-minute Ventricular Fibrillation Canine Model of Cardiac Arrest
WANG Bosong #,ZHONG Jingquan *,ZENG Qixian,LIU Hongzhen,WANG Yuanlong,LIU Donglin,SU Guoying,ZHANG Yun
Medical School, Shandong University, Jinan 250012
*Correspondence author
#Submitted by
Subject:
Funding: Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education(No.20100131110059)
Opened online:11 April 2012
Accepted by: none
Citation: WANG Bosong,ZHONG Jingquan,ZENG Qixian.One-Shock Versus Continuous Defibrillation in an 8-minute Ventricular Fibrillation Canine Model of Cardiac Arrest[OL]. [11 April 2012] http://en.paper.edu.cn/en_releasepaper/content/4474253
 
 
Background: Prior laboratory and clinical studies have demonstrated that early defibrillation has an overriding effect on outcomes of sudden cardiac arrest. With >5-min initial fibrillation time,conventional continuous defibrillation increases the interruption in total resuscitation time and may adversely affect cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) outcome. Continuous chest compression can significantly maintain the coronary perfusion pressure and sustain the circulation. Objective: To investigate the resuscitation effect of a one-shock defibrillation protocol versus conventional continuous defibrillation with treatment variation imposed by active compression-decompression CPR (ACD CPR) or standard CPR (STD CPR). Methods and Results: Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced in anesthetized and ventilated canines. After 8 min of untreated VF, 24 canines were randomly assigned to 4 groups representing all combinations of the one-shock versus continuous defibrillation and 2 different CPR regimens (ACD CPR, STD CPR). Initial shock(s) were delivered, followed by 120 sec of CPR, and the treatment was repeated until resuscitation was successful or for 15 min. The ratio of compression to ventilation was 30:2. Endpoints were restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), defined as spontaneous systolic arterial pressure >50 mmHg, when epinephrine (0.02 mg/kg) was given intravenously; and resuscitation, defined as maintaining systolic arterial pressure >50 mmHg at the 24-hr study endpoint. The one-shock protocol was associated with improved outcome: total resuscitation time was reduced because mean CPR interruption time was reduced from 31% for continuous defibrillation to 19% for the one-shock protocol (P=0.015), and survival was increased from 67% to 100%, respectively (P=0.004). The two CPR methods did not differ in outcomes, but survival was increased to 100% for both methods with the one-shock protocol.Conclusions: In this 8-min VF canine model of cardiac arrest, one-shock CPR versus continuous defibrillation improved survival. ACD CPR is no different from STD CPR in cardiac resuscitation.
Keywords:Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; cardiac arrest; ventricular fibrillation; defibrillation; chest compression; hemodynamics
 
 
 

For this paper

  • PDF (0B)
  • ● Revision 0   
  • ● Print this paper
  • ● Recommend this paper to a friend
  • ● Add to my favorite list

    Saved Papers

    Please enter a name for this paper to be shown in your personalized Saved Papers list

Tags

Add yours

Related Papers

Statistics

PDF Downloaded 314
Bookmarked 0
Recommend 5
Comments Array
Submit your papers